🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on expanding your business? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with comparable "agentic" language

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced positive results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."