🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils will be cut by more than half, after a divisive legislative amendment that forced local governments to put the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more elected officials based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to elect a assured Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, local governments were only able to create a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a public vote in their area. Communities frequently devoted considerable time generating community backing and urging their councils to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying communities ought to determine whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The new legislation required councils that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their wards, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing many regions opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics however have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to policies designed to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has said it wants to terminate “race-based” approaches, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – most urban centers required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent municipal polls registered the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to establish other types of wards – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation indicated the government was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that voted to keep their wards.